09-12-2012, 04:26 PM
Not wanting to be a cat amongst pigeons here, but is this not still on a T2?
If so I find the claimed bhp figures to be highly unlikely, regardless of engine size with the kind of flow needed to feed the 2.1 from a T2 it'll be highly inefficient and just making one hell of a lot of heat.
Torque counts for a lot when it comes to bum dynos. And this is no doubt torquey as f*ck. But I have my doubts over the headline bhp figures people are banding about. Remember the XUD9 usually makes decent power by gov modding it and raising the revs and fuel. A lazier engine, with no increase in revs, I can't see doing anything more than having massive amounts of torque across the rev range...
If so I find the claimed bhp figures to be highly unlikely, regardless of engine size with the kind of flow needed to feed the 2.1 from a T2 it'll be highly inefficient and just making one hell of a lot of heat.
Torque counts for a lot when it comes to bum dynos. And this is no doubt torquey as f*ck. But I have my doubts over the headline bhp figures people are banding about. Remember the XUD9 usually makes decent power by gov modding it and raising the revs and fuel. A lazier engine, with no increase in revs, I can't see doing anything more than having massive amounts of torque across the rev range...
![[Image: signature_zps1a02ba79.jpg]](http://s1128.photobucket.com/user/martypellowe/media/signature_zps1a02ba79.jpg.html)