Posts: 4,189
Threads: 61
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Location: Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
Car Model/Spec: rallye,Astor 6
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
Hi guys
I've be thinking for a wait to save abit of money (£500-£1000) and either
-v6 engine +5 speed box(£500 ish if not abit cheaper)
-tune my 6 lump (which as already got new cultch,rick w flywheel,new oil,filters)
with some p81 cames (circa £400)obvously the cams would have to be mapped(£250ish).
My thinking is a v6 would defo be epic,with plenty of toque(lack of engine mods abit from induction and i have heard of dp doing a turbo kit for them).Also i don t really now anyhting about them ie want ecu to use,engine mounts aswell looks a fecking pig to fit would do the cultch whlist the engines out.i do now they pull wel and have bags of torque.would be to a good if not better for track car?or would the extra weight and power be more of a hinderance?
any advice/ideas ?
thanks sam
Astor 6 Fast road/track project
Posts: 7,152
Threads: 130
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
82
Location: Kingston
Car Model/Spec: 106 GO-NAD
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
for a track car, tune the '6 lump. the v6 will be shockingly heavy up front, which will kill the handling. plus i've heard that while they have a bit of torque, they arent a fun engine to drive. quite lazy.
Member of the 99% warning or you're nothing club
Posts: 2,659
Threads: 115
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
26
Location: Stow
Car Model/Spec: 306
Thanks: 3
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
13-11-2012, 11:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 13-11-2012, 11:21 PM by spike2002.)
406 v6? if so you will want the earlyer type engine unless you are going to run a aftermarket ecu as the later more powerfull engine is multiplex wireing
Posts: 1,847
Threads: 56
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation:
19
Location: Chesterfield
Car Model/Spec: Moonstone HDi
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Posts: 4,189
Threads: 61
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Location: Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
Car Model/Spec: rallye,Astor 6
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
(13-11-2012, 11:20 PM)Oil-burner Wrote: What about a 406 2.0t?
Yeah I thought about that to anyone on here run one ?
Astor 6 Fast road/track project
Posts: 8,298
Threads: 289
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
92
Location: London
Car Model/Spec: Phase 17 R26
Thanks: 0
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
I know the 2.0 turbo conversion is done a fair amount with 205s...
The V6 engine is quite lazy, and as said you'd need to get the earlier version which wasn't multiplexed. It's 198bhp if I remember correctly so it's a lot of work for not a lot more power.
Posts: 7,152
Threads: 130
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
82
Location: Kingston
Car Model/Spec: 106 GO-NAD
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
And remember, an engine conversion always costs more than you first estimate
Member of the 99% warning or you're nothing club
Posts: 4,189
Threads: 61
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Location: Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
Car Model/Spec: rallye,Astor 6
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
Ok, thanks guys I found out I can get 193 bhp from p81's and chip wiard remap so if you take into account my exhaust and viper plus the flywheel fingers crossed for 200 bhp with boring out the inlet and throttle bodie
Astor 6 Fast road/track project
Posts: 401
Threads: 42
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
2
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
i got a 2.0t engine at work, just no turbo on it
Posts: 4,189
Threads: 61
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
11
Location: Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
Car Model/Spec: rallye,Astor 6
Thanks: 2
Given 41 thank(s) in 41 post(s)
Astor 6 Fast road/track project
Posts: 3,109
Threads: 236
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
36
Location: Stevenage
Car Model/Spec: '01 HDi DTurbo
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Low boost is over-done now and they aren't rocket-ship fast for the potential headaches you could let yourself in for.
They are quick don't get me wrong - I'd have one tomorrow - but only as a second car. Jamma on here is turbocharging a GTi6, something which I find far more interesting than the S/C route and it would be very track-friendly too with the right tune. For out-and-out track work nothing really beats a stripped, caged GTi6 running cams and TB's though, should see you nudging 200bhp at the fly....
Disclaimer: The above is not to be taken to heart and is probably a joke, grow up you big girl.
Posts: 14,208
Threads: 448
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
51
Location: isle of wight
Car Model/Spec: Pov. Spec White '6
Thanks: 17
Given 18 thank(s) in 18 post(s)
JP isn't turbocharging. He's going s/c route now.
Sam tune your current engine, some lairy cams decent bodies and a remap. Running with your exhaust etc you will be looking at a decent power gain
TEAM CONROD SHITTING RALLYE!
Posts: 5,024
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
27
Location: North Somerset
Car Model/Spec: E92 335i, GTi6, HDi S2
Thanks: 6
Given 22 thank(s) in 22 post(s)
In the way of handling.. the V6 engine is actually lighter than a 6' engine...
Posts: 3,109
Threads: 236
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
36
Location: Stevenage
Car Model/Spec: '01 HDi DTurbo
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
(14-11-2012, 10:51 AM)Midnightclub Wrote: In the way of handling.. the V6 engine is actually lighter than a 6' engine...
I thought it was the physical size and position of the engine in the car once fitted which was more of an issue? As it hangs over the front axle...
Disclaimer: The above is not to be taken to heart and is probably a joke, grow up you big girl.
Posts: 5,024
Threads: 82
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
27
Location: North Somerset
Car Model/Spec: E92 335i, GTi6, HDi S2
Thanks: 6
Given 22 thank(s) in 22 post(s)
14-11-2012, 11:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 14-11-2012, 11:54 AM by Midnightclub.)
Physical size would be pretty irrelevant but the weight and position/angle would, i guess it would depend how it's fitted in the bay
Posts: 6,482
Threads: 226
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
24
Location: Cornwall
Car Model/Spec: A3 TDi
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Go v6. Sounds cool. End of.
Doesnt even own a 306.
|