Posts: 24
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Location: west yorkshire
Car Model/Spec: S1 rallye 16v Turbo
Sorry for askin the same old question but im in need of advice!
Im stickin a 1.9 dci into my1.5 megane, its the 130 spec with gt1749v turbo.
Now, im looking at 200bhp but unsure if this turbo can take it, and seeing as though you guys run 1.9 engines its pretty similar!
Darksidedevelopments use a gtb1749v to reach 200bhp on the 1.9 8v but whats the difference from a gt to a gtb?
Would a gt1852v from a 2.2 be a better option? I will be retaining the ecu vac can control aswel.
Any other options i can look at?
Cheers
Craig
Posts: 18,242
Threads: 386
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
87
Location: Suffolk
Car Model/Spec: Focus Titanium
I don't see how a PSA XUD is in anyway similar to a Renault DCi...except the capacity lol.
As for the turbo though, they use a 1749v on 1.9PD's which can push 200bhp, and the same with Vaux 1.9CDTi's which can make over 200bhp...
Posts: 24
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Location: west yorkshire
Car Model/Spec: S1 rallye 16v Turbo
(22-07-2014, 08:58 AM)Toms306 Wrote: I don't see how a PSA XUD is in anyway similar to a Renault DCi...except the capacity lol.
As for the turbo though, they use a 1749v on 1.9PD's which can push 200bhp, and the same with Vaux 1.9CDTi's which can make over 200bhp...
Exactly that, same displacement, so would be similar in exhaust gas volume and air in. And as there is a few turbo guys ie ruan, darren and james to name a few i was looking at what would be best suited to this size engine
Posts: 15,645
Threads: 541
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
124
Location: Aylesbury
Car Model/Spec: 320bhp Impreza WRX
I think the 49 will be right at its limit at 200bhp. You might actually make the power easier with the 1852.
The Garrett turbo series started as GT then went to GTA and are now on the GTB series (actually I'm sure I've seen GTC stuff but its out of our price range) anyway the more modern stuff tends to be more efficient and less laggy. Any VNT turbo is likely to be a GTA even if it doesn't say so on it.
Posts: 2,083
Threads: 106
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
7
Location: Manchester
Car Model/Spec: GTi-6
Craig, just go bigger turbo. Will make the power MUCH easier, less heat, less stress etc etc.
JP
JP
Posts: 20,092
Threads: 591
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
54
Location: Cotswolds
Car Model/Spec: Stage 13 16v HDi
GTB is a big leap on from GTs
Posts: 5,205
Threads: 91
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
83
Location: Oxfordshire/Cornwall
Car Model/Spec: Moonstone DT/Volvo V50
GTB1749s are all well and good and yes they will make 200hp... No point in spending money on putting one in for really pushing it...
On a 1.9 8v Commonrail I'd be looking at something like a GTB1756VK or GTB2056VK - the 1756 will make 230hp, the 2056 will make 260 or so.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. 
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Posts: 24
Threads: 2
Joined: Mar 2014
Location: west yorkshire
Car Model/Spec: S1 rallye 16v Turbo
Got the engine sat in the garage now, just waitin on the turbo, rs tuning say 170-180bhp is max on this turbo, so what do we reckon, hybrid to make a gt1752v or just go gt1852v? What would be the difference between the hybrid 17 to the 18?
