01-10-2014, 12:28 PM
Early 924's were an Audi/Porsche project, 4 stud running gear, drum rear brakes.
924S was a proper Porsche, still maintained the Audi Transmission but moved to an early design of the 944 running gear.
944 was all Porsche (engine, transmission suspension)
They are surprisingly different.
I adore the design of the 944, but the Audi link with the 924 makes a conversion I'm thinking about a lot easier.
The 924 is also a lot lights and arguably handles better.
For reference here's the two I've currently got lined up...
![[Image: 20140910.jpg]](http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/15/14/89/87/20140910.jpg)
924...
Pros - no rust, full (and tidy) interior
Cons - its a 924, doesn't run (suspect fuel pump)
![[Image: 20140911.jpg]](http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/15/14/89/87/20140911.jpg)
944...
Pros - its a late model with the nice kit, runs and drives.
Cons - No interior (and I mean NOTHING), rotten sills
#cantdecide
924S was a proper Porsche, still maintained the Audi Transmission but moved to an early design of the 944 running gear.
944 was all Porsche (engine, transmission suspension)
They are surprisingly different.
I adore the design of the 944, but the Audi link with the 924 makes a conversion I'm thinking about a lot easier.
The 924 is also a lot lights and arguably handles better.
For reference here's the two I've currently got lined up...
924...
Pros - no rust, full (and tidy) interior
Cons - its a 924, doesn't run (suspect fuel pump)
944...
Pros - its a late model with the nice kit, runs and drives.
Cons - No interior (and I mean NOTHING), rotten sills
#cantdecide
Matt-Rallye Wrote:Norledge for prime minister.
Poodle Wrote:I reckon Norledge has got it on the head mind.
Matt-Rallye Wrote:Norledge gets my vote tbh.