is this a 2.1 engine

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
is this a 2.1 engine
#1
Was lookin at a few engine s in work and came a cross this [attachment=19817][attachment=19818][attachment=19819][attachment=19820][attachment=19821]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
Looks like a 2.0/2.2 16v HDi unit, although I don't know them well enough to say which, someone will confirm
[Image: Ty8kl7b.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#3
I'd guess 2.2 HDi by the inlet but again I'm not a guru!
Supercharged GTi6 Build
S14 Zenki Build
[Image: signature.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
It's a HDi so not a 2.1.

Oops, too late. lol
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
Lol I no feck all about them ether lol BT have 2.2 hdi ones here to BT there 8v ones
Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
Almost defo a 2.2HDi - can tell by turbo.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#7
Its definitely a 16v HDi lump

I wouldnt like to say if it was a 2.0 or a 2.2 because although I agree with ruan about the turbo it looks a tad short to be the 2.2.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#8
Either way a good motor to radge a mechanical pump on. Big Grin
Supercharged GTi6 Build
S14 Zenki Build
[Image: signature.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#9
(29-10-2014, 11:30 AM)silverzx Wrote: Either way a good motor to radge a mechanical pump on. Big Grin

That's what I was thinking :-)

Engine code is
PSA 4hx
10 dz 10
4008692
Reply
Thanks given by:
#10
The 2.2 16v I have here says

4038648
10 DZ 17
PSA 4HX

That's on the belt cover but this is slightly different to what's on the block so I assume its been changed at some point and I'm not crawling around on the floor outside to find the block number.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#11
(29-10-2014, 12:12 PM)Dum-Dum Wrote: The 2.2 16v I have here says

4038648
10 DZ 17
PSA 4HX

That's on the belt cover but this is slightly different to what's on the block so I assume its been changed at some point and I'm not crawling around on the floor outside to find the block number.

Lol k so its a 2.2 hdi 16v can that be fitted in a 306 :-) that the next question.....
Reply
Thanks given by:
#12
It can and has been done.. Jimmer has the 2.2 16v HDi dimma so could be worth popping him a PM for some advice? or his project thread etc..
[Image: Ty8kl7b.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#13
Darren also ran one. Sure he has LOADS of pictures.
Supercharged GTi6 Build
S14 Zenki Build
[Image: signature.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#14
Thanks every one I will take a look at them then to he mutch messing about there is to fit it lol
Reply
Thanks given by:
#15
Darren never ran the 2.2?

The main issue with fitting the 2.2 over the 2L is the fact that the block is about 10mm taller and this makes the engine VERY close to the master cylinder.

IIRC bits need trimming off the cam position sensor and plastics in that area
Reply
Thanks given by:
#16
It was 2.0 then, go for it, mechanical 2.2 should be interesting! Big Grin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjTINDYx...w&index=37
Supercharged GTi6 Build
S14 Zenki Build
[Image: signature.png]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#17
(29-10-2014, 01:45 PM)Dum-Dum Wrote: Darren never ran the 2.2?

The main issue with fitting the 2.2 over the 2L is the fact that the block is about 10mm taller and this makes the engine VERY close to the master cylinder.

IIRC bits need trimming off the cam position sensor and plastics in that area

Or drop the engine downwards...

The 2.2 is much more awkward to fit than the 2.0 - putting a mechanical pump on is not a 20 second job....

It's definitely a 2.2 as the turbo is a GT1549P rather than the standard GT1549 as put on the 2.0 16v.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#18
The 2.0 16v an 'RHR' engine code AFAIK
Reply
Thanks given by:
#19
(29-10-2014, 02:53 PM)Ruan Wrote:
(29-10-2014, 01:45 PM)Dum-Dum Wrote: Darren never ran the 2.2?

The main issue with fitting the 2.2 over the 2L is the fact that the block is about 10mm taller and this makes the engine VERY close to the master cylinder.

IIRC bits need trimming off the cam position sensor and plastics in that area

Or drop the engine downwards...

The 2.2 is much more awkward to fit than the 2.0 - putting a mechanical pump on is not a 20 second job....

It's definitely a 2.2 as the turbo is a GT1549P rather than the standard GT1549 as put on the 2.0 16v.
How hard would fitting a Bosch mechanical pump be I no its not easy BT would be worth it in the end up wouldn't it :-)
Reply
Thanks given by:
#20
i am wondering how it would faire putting a 2.216v hdi in the 306....

much work?
Given the choice between Niall and the sheep. I would choose the sheep!
/Toseland
Reply
Thanks given by:
#21
(29-10-2014, 04:05 PM)mr_fish Wrote: The 2.0 16v an 'RHR' engine code AFAIK

RHR is a Siemens HDi - this is defo a Bosch

The 2.0 16v Bosch HDi has engine codes RHM, RHW, RHT.

RHM Tends to be the Automatic, I think the RHW/RHT might be DPF/Non-DPF motors respectively.

Fitting a 2.2 into a 306 is a twat, especially when you consider that the bore of the 2.0/2.2 8v/16v is the same - why not just ram the 2.2/2.0 head on an 8v bottom end with 16v pistons in... So much easier.
(16-05-2016, 10:45 AM)Toms306 Wrote: Oh I don't care about the stripped threads lol, that's easily solved by hammering the bolt in. Wink
Nanstone GTD5 GT17S - XUD9TE
Volvo V50 D5 R-Design SE Sport - Daily cruise wagon.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#22
(29-10-2014, 06:49 PM)Ruan Wrote:
(29-10-2014, 04:05 PM)mr_fish Wrote: The 2.0 16v an 'RHR' engine code AFAIK

RHR is a Siemens HDi - this is defo a Bosch

The 2.0 16v Bosch HDi has engine codes RHM, RHW, RHT.

RHM Tends to be the Automatic, I think the RHW/RHT might be DPF/Non-DPF motors respectively.

Fitting a 2.2 into a 306 is a twat, especially when you consider that the bore of the 2.0/2.2 8v/16v is the same - why not just ram the 2.2/2.0 head on an 8v bottom end with 16v pistons in... So much easier.

Thanks for the info ruan not doing any thing for a while BT I will have a good think about what u said wat could one of these engine make bhp whise with the right turbo on it . wat way would u have to work the camshaft sensor and all that sort of stuff :-)
Reply
Thanks given by:


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)