newly fitted cyclones :-)

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
newly fitted cyclones :-)
#1
after waiting three weeks for the new bolts to come. i have finally fitted my cyclones. im well impressed with the look of the car with them on.
   
Reply
Thanks given by:
#2
woh...moon buggy alert!!

look very neat mate....but needs some lowering!!!
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#3
yeah i did notice mate. espec the front. there running 195 45 15. the gap looks massive on the front compared to the crappy tsw alloys i had on there. moneys tight at the mo tho so doing a bit at a time. seeing as my scenic is being a ass at the mo as well lol. bloody renaults.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#4
Does look like its on stilts! Haha 45 is rather low profile, everyone runs 50 at least as far as I know!
They look good though! I want some silver clones for mine!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#5
yeah the '45 wont help.

lowering springs can be had for £30-40 sometimes with gti struts and doing the rear is just some effort and time if you handy with the tools
Wishes for more power...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#6
45?! Were they on a 106 before hand?
[Image: 20A1806D-891D-40FB-BD52-AD519177A607-734...391753.jpg]
TEAM CONROD SHITTING RALLYE!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#7
my car doesnt have that much arch gap when i jack it up!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#8
looks straight though. Bury the Renault Puke in a shallow grave lol
1999 2.0 8v Turbo 306

Flying the Flag for the XU10J2TE


You Tube: 832 Performance
Reply
Thanks given by:
#9
looks much better. needs lots of lows and some 50s now

[Image: DSC_0190-Copy_zpsf093f84d.jpg]
Member of 99% warning or your nothing club!

Reply
Thanks given by:
#10
55s fill the arches much better, even at standard height. Wink
Reply
Thanks given by:
#11
My arches are filled enough with 50s :p
Reply
Thanks given by:
#12
(01-09-2013, 09:02 AM)Toms306 Wrote: 55s fill the arches much better, even at standard height. Wink

+ I find the ride slightly better
[Image: siggy1.jpg]

the smokey old bus that sounds like a tractor...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#13
Im not sure what they were running on before. Bought them off tyronnester.
Il have to get some lowering springs for the front. I wont change the tyres for a while as they came with decent ones on.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#14
(01-09-2013, 09:44 AM)Stephen Wrote: My arches are filled enough with 50s :p

Your's is low though. Tongue

I only ever went down 40mm lol...

(01-09-2013, 09:46 AM)devils_fuel Wrote:
(01-09-2013, 09:02 AM)Toms306 Wrote: 55s fill the arches much better, even at standard height. Wink

+ I find the ride slightly better

Same here, but the youngsters don't seem to care about that! lol

55s at standard height btw.... Fills the rear arch so much better. Wink

[Image: Photo-0007-8.jpg]

[Image: Photo-0011-6.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#15
55's at -40mm

[Image: aqymydyd.jpg]


No pics but now -45mm and looks better
[Image: siggy1.jpg]

the smokey old bus that sounds like a tractor...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#16
You sure that's 40mm!?

Heres mine on 30mm Eibachs...

[Image: ChinaPhotoshootandParts039_zpsec500d1e.jpg]

Also 40mm drop on Koni's...

[Image: Photo-0100.jpg]

And 40mm on cheap shit springs... Same cyclones and 55 profiles on each car btw. Big Grin

[Image: Photo-0228.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#17
They were -40 springs for a saxo...so about -42mm then Smile
[Image: siggy1.jpg]

the smokey old bus that sounds like a tractor...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#18
Still looked a bit high for 40mm to me lol. But it seems the estate drops more than the hatches now I've found the other pics. Not sure why, they're the same at the front lol!
Reply
Thanks given by:
#19
There's no way they're -40mm for a Saxo... They would drop a lot lower and ride like shite.

I think 50s look a lot better than 55s on a lowered car, they tend to look a bit balloon-esque. I can't imagine you'd notice that much difference in comfort on a lowered car, either.

Lastly, Tom, you are a youngster you tart.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#20
(01-09-2013, 10:55 AM)Curt Wrote: There's no way they're -40mm for a Saxo... They would drop a lot lower and ride like shite.

I think 50s look a lot better than 55s on a lowered car, they tend to look a bit balloon-esque. I can't imagine you'd notice that much difference in comfort on a lowered car, either.

Lastly, Tom, you are a youngster you tart.

I've been in Rowells car on 50 profiles at 40mm.....much preferred my own on 55s! But I do like ride comfort...a lot. As for being a youngster, age is just a number. I prefer ride comfort, not caring about speed bumps and grip over looks any day! And 5 doors!! Big Grin

Also...while I was looking through Pug pics came across this.......... Poverty spec 1.4 Miami, standard height...only mod was the 'clones. Check that arch gap! lmao

[Image: Lastpicsofmyfirstcar-521200.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#21
Check out this arch gap


[Image: my3063.jpg]


[Image: CIMG3940.jpg]

[Image: CIMG3794.jpg]

Hahaha
Reply
Thanks given by:
#22
14" swallows? I can beat that! 13" steels.... lol

[Image: Thedaymyfirstcarwassold.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
#23
(01-09-2013, 10:55 AM)Curt Wrote: There's no way they're -40mm for a Saxo... They would drop a lot lower and ride like shite.

I think 50s look a lot better than 55s on a lowered car, they tend to look a bit balloon-esque. I can't imagine you'd notice that much difference in comfort on a lowered car, either.

Lastly, Tom, you are a youngster you tart.

They were from airey the fairy and advertised as -40mm drop, only while fitting I found out they were from a saxo lol

The ride quality was ok until they both snapped at the top then the quality was...erm better lol. Now on gti shocks with -50mm springs and all is well
[Image: siggy1.jpg]

the smokey old bus that sounds like a tractor...
Reply
Thanks given by:
#24
get it lowered!
Reply
Thanks given by:


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)