Ruan I appreciate what your saying but the OP is taking about a (Im assuming used) T25 turbo that was designed at some point before I was even born.
I do appreciate what your saying about stroking and cams moving in opposite directions but if youve looked at the milder performance cams for the 6 they dont move the peak power any further up the rev range.
Anyway for comparison
GTi6 power comparisons.xls (Size: 28.5 KB / Downloads: 1)
This is based on the data contained in Petes GTi6 standard power graph and the 2 graphs below, the 230bhp is a 2.1 and the 250bhp is a S/C
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f257/m...Rgraph.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/c...asd001.jpg
Ill remind you that the S/C will have a bit more low down and mid range than a turbod car also the S/C is running a little more boost than the OP is talking about so making a little more power. If i could find one to do a 230bhp N/A to 230bhp boosted comparison but i reckon it would be pretty interesting.
I do appreciate what your saying about stroking and cams moving in opposite directions but if youve looked at the milder performance cams for the 6 they dont move the peak power any further up the rev range.
Anyway for comparison
GTi6 power comparisons.xls (Size: 28.5 KB / Downloads: 1)
This is based on the data contained in Petes GTi6 standard power graph and the 2 graphs below, the 230bhp is a 2.1 and the 250bhp is a S/C
http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f257/m...Rgraph.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/c...asd001.jpg
Ill remind you that the S/C will have a bit more low down and mid range than a turbod car also the S/C is running a little more boost than the OP is talking about so making a little more power. If i could find one to do a 230bhp N/A to 230bhp boosted comparison but i reckon it would be pretty interesting.