10-04-2016, 07:49 AM
(09-04-2016, 09:11 PM)MY95 Wrote: Id say a 206 actually has a much better build quality than a 306 (had both), 306 are really poor to be honest. I remember my old 206 HDI used to sip through fuel, easy 50 mpg no question, was petty nippy too as standard, nothing like a stage 1/2/3 but was alright. Only downside I found was that the pedals were even closer together than the 306, other than that I think they are just as capable IMO, don't feel as good through the wheel handling wise though, cheaper to run though! This ones quite nice and has a FSH.... although the seller is talking bs when he says its £30 a year to tax.... http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Peugeot-206-2-...SwbwlXCP5DI agree with this. Had a 2001 hdi 206 before the 306, in fact I had a 307 hdi estate in between. The 206 is lighter handles well and is more refined then the 306. You don't get all the clatter and banging when driving around.
Seriously considering one to replace my 306 HDI eventually, just not sure when. Id say go for one, they are cheap now, D Turbo or Xsi's have really nice seats that look the same as in 306 D Turbo, built better, cheaper to tax and cheaper on fuel, like a newer 306 to be honest.
The engine is the same, although I am told the newer gearboxes are weaker. I had no trouble with mine. Having done a Cam belt on all three, they are really no worse or better than each other. The 206 is just a little more tight.
Looks wise the 306 is a clear winner. The 206 looks a bit girly.
All depends what you want from the car?
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk