Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MG ZS VVC conversion
#12
(23-09-2014, 08:51 AM)SRowell Wrote: so is this one just as fast as yours? Or is it even slower? D:

it will be slower as its heavier than his posh rover, but the Rover 400 is better one of the two, if you want pure rear wheel action the badass v8 rover 75 is the one to have.

(23-09-2014, 11:55 AM)Piggy Wrote: Why do people rave about those V6s I'll never know. Underpowered, lazy and thirsty.

expensive to sort out when they go wrong! I think your looking about 700 quid to do the belt/ chain on a V6!
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 22-09-2014, 12:00 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by C2K - 22-09-2014, 12:04 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by Piggy - 22-09-2014, 12:06 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 22-09-2014, 04:24 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by 306Dan - 22-09-2014, 08:36 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by procta - 22-09-2014, 08:50 PM
MG ZS VVC conversion - by DavidA - 22-09-2014, 09:45 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by Eeyore - 23-09-2014, 08:51 AM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 23-09-2014, 11:46 AM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by Piggy - 23-09-2014, 11:55 AM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 23-09-2014, 12:00 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by procta - 23-09-2014, 12:22 PM
MG ZS VVC conversion - by DavidA - 23-09-2014, 03:31 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by procta - 23-09-2014, 10:48 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 23-09-2014, 09:16 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by Pete - 23-09-2014, 09:27 PM
MG ZS VVC conversion - by DavidA - 23-09-2014, 09:57 PM
RE: MG ZS VVC conversion - by lolsteve - 18-01-2015, 09:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)