Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rather cheap?
#12
(16-07-2013, 03:20 PM)cwspellowe Wrote:
(16-07-2013, 03:17 PM)Mitch Wrote: Your probably right, breaking would be the best option, i picked up my blaze in april 2011 for 550, with 90k on the clock, its not far of mint inside and out, and i picked my rallye up for... well i dont think you would like to know that Smile

I'm assuming you mean cheap cheap Wallye?

In which case, go take a flying f*ck to yourself.

Hahaha, yes you could put it that way, guy had put it down for spares and repairs because the drivers strut top was creeking and the top engine mount had broke?Itwasntme
Blaze '6 and Blaze D-turbo!
Reply
Thanks given by:


Messages In This Thread
Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:01 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by cwspellowe - 16-07-2013, 03:03 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:08 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by cwspellowe - 16-07-2013, 03:09 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 03:12 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by ginge191 - 16-07-2013, 03:18 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by bigcheez2k3 - 16-07-2013, 06:49 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:17 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by cwspellowe - 16-07-2013, 03:20 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:23 PM
Re: RE: Rather cheap? - by vlj - 16-07-2013, 03:21 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by ginge191 - 16-07-2013, 03:22 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 03:22 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by ginge191 - 16-07-2013, 03:30 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 16-07-2013, 05:27 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Dum-Dum - 16-07-2013, 03:25 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:31 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 03:32 PM
Re: Rather cheap? - by vlj - 16-07-2013, 03:33 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by ginge191 - 16-07-2013, 03:33 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Matt - 16-07-2013, 03:52 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 03:59 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Matt - 16-07-2013, 04:01 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 04:06 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Matt - 16-07-2013, 04:13 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Dum-Dum - 16-07-2013, 04:15 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 04:19 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 05:40 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 16-07-2013, 05:41 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 06:11 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 16-07-2013, 06:12 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 06:17 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 07:09 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 16-07-2013, 07:10 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by 306Puggy - 16-07-2013, 07:12 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by puglove - 16-07-2013, 07:25 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 16-07-2013, 07:33 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 16-07-2013, 08:28 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Dum-Dum - 16-07-2013, 07:44 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 17-07-2013, 09:05 AM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 17-07-2013, 05:09 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 17-07-2013, 05:18 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 17-07-2013, 05:22 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Piggy - 17-07-2013, 05:29 PM
RE: Rather cheap? - by Mitch - 17-07-2013, 06:37 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)