23-09-2012, 04:58 PM
(23-09-2012, 03:55 PM)Dum-Dum Wrote:(23-09-2012, 02:38 PM)Ed Doe Wrote: As a general rule, everything Dumdum ever says is to be ignored if you don't want to end up scrapping your car.
Go and troll elsewhere Ed. I was trying to be serious/helpful.
You forget that I have done alot of the mechanical things here that others just talk about and not only that but studied engineering and have worked for Honda and a company building custom trackday/race motorbikes in my time.
Ok Mr. Honda Engineer.
Lets talk about area under the torque/rpm graph.
Let us for a minute dwell upon the differences between the application of a turbocharger vs n/a tuning.
A low-boost turbocharged '6 with the correct compressor will eat your 2.1 for beakfast. On a race track you will probably find it a little closer, but the reality of driving a highly tuned n/a on the road is that it will be very lumpy and you'll be waiting a long time to get on-cam. By comparison the turbo will up and go. The mid-range punch will far outstrip your car out of lower speed corners, something which will be exacerbated by the 6speed box. Unless you modify the final drive or run a 1.6gti box.
Either way, bang for buck, a turbocharged rs engine will be far more flexible day to day, and far more of a weapon on the roads than a 2.1. Though the 2.1 will sound pornographic in the process of being beaten...
And there is no way a 2.1 will cost you significantly less. and be less temperamental. and probably more fun to drive more of the time.
'99 Ph3 Diablo Gti(Victor) Dead
Astor 'X' 4 GTi6-6 - SOLD!
'08 LY Renault Megane RS 230 F1 Team R26 - GONE
'56 BMW Z4 Coupe 3.0si Sport - SCHWIIIING!
Astor 'X' 4 GTi6-6 - SOLD!

'08 LY Renault Megane RS 230 F1 Team R26 - GONE
'56 BMW Z4 Coupe 3.0si Sport - SCHWIIIING!