![]() |
f*cking ra*e? - Printable Version +- 306oc - Peugeot 306 Owners Club & Forum (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum) +-- Forum: General (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: The Couch (https://www.306oc.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: f*cking ra*e? (/showthread.php?tid=35325) |
f*cking ra*e? - Dum-Dum - 13-12-2016 Is ra*e really a word we need to swear filter to edit? It's not a f*cking swear word, it's not rude and it seems weird that you filter ra*e but I bet it doesn't filter buggery or beastiality which I would suggest fall into the same category of word. RE: f*cking ra*e? - Danny Wideboy - 13-12-2016 f*ck, lady garden Bollocks ra*e and shit. Just checking swear filter. There you go. Bollocks and shit are acceptable. Apparently. RE: f*cking ra*e? - bashbarnard - 13-12-2016 ra*e shit bollocks yeah seems odd to me. i dont think that ra*e should be like this but there is probably an underlying thing like when we had king of the pussys and google kept flagging us as porn site RE: f*cking ra*e? - Piggy - 13-12-2016 Be nice if didnt need a filter. A "*" doesnt make it undereadable anymore to anyone over the age of 5 who has eyes RE: f*cking ra*e? - Dum-Dum - 13-12-2016 (13-12-2016, 07:22 PM)Piggy Wrote: Be nice if didnt need a filter. Actually it does make it unreadable in some circumstances. Usually on the f*ck/shit/lady garden stuff it doesn't bother me but ra*e really confuses me, my dyslexic brain has to read it 3 times even when it was me who wrote the bloody sentence. This was actually the reason that prompted me to post this thread. RE: f*cking ra*e? - Mattcheese31 - 13-12-2016 i don't think this is a great thread to have really so i'm locking it, if anyone has any concerns and if you can find them, maybe you can hire . . . . . . The A-dmin . . . . . ![]() |